to the day meaning in Hindi

Examples

1. Five years and eight months 1 My mind goes back to the day in Chungking when I first learnt of the German invasion of Poland and the outbreak of the war in Europe .
   पांच साल और आठ महीने.मैं उस दिन को सोचता हूं , जब मैंने चुड किड में पोZलैंड पर जर्मनी के हमले और यूरोप में जंग के छिड़ने की खबरें सुनी थीं .
2. He sees three unripe mangoes fall down on the ground and his mind flies back to the days of his boyhood when unripe mangoes were “ the golden key that opened the door to the secret chamber of daylong joy . ”
   तीन कच्चे आम देखकर उनका मस्तिष्क फिर से बचपन की यादों में खो जाता है जब अंबिया एक ऐसी ? सोने की चाबी होती थी जो दिन भर की मस्ती का रहस्यपूर्ण कमरा खोलती थी . ?
3. Ed Gillespie, former chairman of the Republican National Committee. Conservatives should emulate this achievement. With Ed Gillespie , a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, I look forward to the day when it will be as cool “to believe in the principles of free enterprise, the need for strong national security, the merits of traditional families, and the value of religious faith as it is to sneer at capitalism, demean the military, denigrate parents, and deride religion.” Happily, American conservatives have a counter-establishment already in place: the Wall Street Journal and Fox News Channel may be best known, but the Bradley Foundation, Pepperdine University, the Liberty Film Festival, and Commentary matter no less. Yes, conservative institutions rarely enjoy the history, resources, and prestige of their liberal counterparts - but they do exist, they are growing, and they possess a convincing and optimistic message.
   क्या कुछ गलत रहा इसके अनेक विश्लेषण किये गये : रोमनी अधिक परम्परावादी थे या कि जितना होना चाहिये था उतने नहीं थे, वे अपने बारे में अधिक बोलते रहे और मुद्दों पर चर्चा करने से बचते रहे। वे जनमानस के साथ जुड नहीं सके। इसके साथ ही अनेक निष्कर्ष निकाले गये हैं : परम्परावादियों को अधिक आधुनिक होना होगा ( समलैंगिक सम्बंध में) उन्हें अश्वेतों के पास जाना होगा ( अवैध आप्रवासियों का स्वागत करना होगा) उन्हें सही मायने में परम्परावदियों का मनोनयन करना चाहिये।
4. Apr. 11, 2013 addenda : Some reflections that did not fit the main article: (1) Before this article appeared, I gave a several interviews ( here , here and here ) advocating tactical support for the Assad regime; these prompted name-calling by CAIR and some hysterical reactions about me urging genocide in Syria. No: I look forward to the day when Syria is at peace with itself and a good neighbor, when its government is democratic and law-abiding. But until that distant time, I prefer that evil forces direct their attentions against each other than against the outside world. (2) To the argument that early Western support for the rebels would have prevented the Islamists from dominating them ( which they now do ), I reply that Western powers did provide early support to rebels in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt and look what that achieved - Islamists dominate all three of those countries. The same would likely have been the case in Syria. Western assistance is not that influential in altering the course of an ideological movement. (3) I dislike advocating support for Assad and respect the intentions of those who share my goals but disagree with my means. I do, however, see them engaging in wishful, non-strategic thinking. (4) That my approach gives priority to strategic considerations marks it, in the context of modern Western politics, as conservative. Liberals enjoy a confidence in their own wellbeing that conservatives lack. Where liberals tend to worry about others (snail darters), conservatives tend to worry about themselves (a sufficient electricity supply). Consistent with this temperamental difference, the former focus on civilian welfare in Syria and the latter on Western security. (5) My advice is hardly original to me but is old-fashioned Realpolitik. Put differently, it fits into a divide-and-rule tradition that goes back to the Romans. (6) Assad's staying in power has the advantage that the regime's chemical weapons are less dangerous than if he fell.
   इस भावना के अनुरूप मेरा तर्क है कि अमेरिका को हारते हुए पक्ष की सहायता करनी चाहिये और वह कोई भी क्यों न हो, जैसा कि मई 1987 के विश्लेषण में मैंने कहा था, “ 1980 में जब इराक ने ईरान को धमकी दी थी तो हमारा हित कुछ मात्रा में ईरान के साथ था। परंतु 1982 की गर्मियों से इराक रक्षात्मक हो गया और अब वाशिंगटन पूरी तरह इसके साथ है..... भविष्य की ओर यदि देखें तो क्या इराक एक बार पुनः आक्रामक हो सकेगा वैसे तो यह सम्भव नहीं दिखता परंतु असम्भव भी नहीं है, अमेरिका को फिर से युद्ध में आना चाहिये और ईरान को सहायता करने के सम्बंध में सोचना चाहिये” ।